Date: Sat, 30 Apr 94 04:30:01 PDT From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #81 To: tcp-group-digest TCP-Group Digest Sat, 30 Apr 94 Volume 94 : Issue 81 Today's Topics: empty sockets? LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS (2 msgs) TCP-Group Digest V94 #80 Send Replies or notes for publication to: . Subscription requests to . Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri Apr 29 16:55:41 1994 From: rbates@inquire.pixar.com (Rick Bates) Subject: empty sockets? To: tcp-group@UCSD.EDU Hi all. This may have already been reported here, but I noticed the other night when trying to move mail on a slow channel, that every time I used the 'remote' command to 'kick' the other end, a socket was opened. Each socket stayed open even after the connection was closed. While it didn't appear to affect anything, the socket count went up and stayed up. Is this anything that matters? Rick, WA6NHC rbates@inquire.pixar.com ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Apr 94 21:52:11 +02 From: "Alessandro Agostini" Subject: LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS To: TCP-Group@ucsd.edu Hello, I have tried to introduce an LZW compression in telnet in a KA9Q/Pa0gri 2.0p NOS version. The result is good in ham-radio use as no one on air can see your login and password. But i met this problem: the LZW-compressed socket works ok in telnet in both directions as long as no side tries to negotiate telnet options (IAC, DO, WILL, WONT, DONT ...). But if this happens, for example when the socked is worked in binary (not cooked mode) with no local echo , lzw protocol error occur. Any of you have found something similar ? Any suggestions ? ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Apr 1994 17:41:08 -0400 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: LZW compressed sockets on KA9Q ,Pa0gri NOS To: agostini@ir5tcp.iroe.fi.cnr.it > I have tried to introduce an LZW compression in telnet in a KA9Q/Pa0gri 2.0p > NOS version. The result is good in ham-radio use as no one on air can see > your login and password. Of course, it would be trivial to break this "security". This alone is certainly not a good reason to use LZW compression. louie WA3YMH ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 29 Apr 1994 14:59:21 +0100 (BST) From: M.Willis@ee.surrey.ac.uk Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #80 To: TCP-Group@ucsd.edu I am having trouble making JNOS 1.10b work. Can anyone give me a config.nos file to look at. I am trying to run it on 2 ports, one a kiss mode MFJ1278 and the other a baycom. It appears to work but FTP sessions fail after a time and it goes very slowly. The T1 timer becomes very large very quickly and no fiddling with maxwait will sort it. How can the software to be mad eto send files quickly on dedicated freqs? Mike ------------------------------ End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #81 ******************************